« Episode 132: Interview with Michael James | Main | Episode 131: Q and A Session #1 »
Wednesday
Mar032010

PiXel LV-W1 for Pole-Aerial-Photography

 

I came across this newfangled device the other week and did a double-take - a serious tool for pole-aerial-photography that would actually improve my workflow? Possibly…

The PiXel LV-W1 is basically made up of two components, the transmitter and the receiver, with a few cords in between. The transmitter hooks up to your DSLR and shoots its live-view image over to the receiver via the 2.4 GHz spectrum, at which point you compose your shot and remotely trigger the shutter. All of this can be done up to 80 meters (262 feet) away, but I doubt that would necessary for PAP. It should be noted that you do need a camera that supports live-view and has a shutter release input to use this device, as that's how you get the video feed to the receiver and trigger the shutter.

Personally, I see a great deal of potential in a gadget like this, especially for pole-aerial-photography. Being able to see exactly what your camera sees when it's 15, 20, even 30 feet up in the air would be incredible - it takes the 'guess-and-check' approach out of the equation. Sure, there are solutions out there now that allow you to achieve similar results, but none of them have the range, the live-view feed, the 3" screen, the shutter release, and the rechargeable battery - unless you build it yourself, of course.

Update: Michael James of the hdriblog.com has directed us to a few other products that accomplish this task in a similar manner. Each is unique in how they do it, so be sure to check them out and pick the one that fits your workflow best.

Here's a rundown of the specs:

  • LV-W1 image transmit is using 2.4GHz frequency channel, 3 specific channels.
  • Shutter control is using 433MHz frequency channel (available to use another frequency channel). 3 specific channels.
  • Operating distance range is up to 80M.
  • The display is protected by coating; it’s not easy to get scratch.
  • 3inch TFT display, adjustable the brightness .
  • Resolution: 960 X 240
  • 3.7V 1200mAh lithium battery. Working hour: Transmitter --- 8 hours or above.              Receiver ---   5hours or above.
  • The receiver is usable to connect the camera directly, just like CT-122. Use VD-936 (optional) to connect and transfer the live view to PC.
  • Compatible for camera which included AV Output and shutter release socket.
  • Charging method: via charger or USB cable for charging  the battery inside the device.

You can check out the PiXel LV-W1 here and purchase one here.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (9)

Hi Mike, I have been eyeballing this from when it was announced a few months ago. Now it finally found it's way to retailers.
I haven't found any reviews yet though.. only one post of a guy who tried it out on a PMA and said it worked "very very well".

March 4, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAnton

Hey Anton - I'm probably going to wind up buying one of these soon. I'll make sure to do a podcast/blog entry about it if it works well with my workflow.

March 4, 2010 | Registered CommenterMike

Other options are:

Gigtube Wireless Digital Viewfinder - http://www.aputure.com/en/product/gigitube_wireless_digital_viewfinder.htm

Pro-View actually has a device that that locks onto the viewfinder and the video signal is actually the device feeding a live picture of the little camera looking through your camera's actually viewfinder. This means the camera does not need to be on Live View:
http://www.proviewsite.com/index.html

If all you need is a few feet or up to 2 meters there is a sub-$200 option (wired)
Aputure Gigtube Instant Digital Screen Remote Viewfinder
http://www.aputure.com/en/product/gigtube_instant_digita_screen_visible_remote_control.htm

Michael James
http://www.hdriblog.com

March 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMichael James

Nice finds Michael! It appears that each product has it's own unique take on how to feed and capture the shot. Thanks for the links.

March 6, 2010 | Registered CommenterMike

Now that I saw it I want one ... :)
It's very hard to frame a house with the camera up in the air ...
right now I need another guy to trigger the remote while I hold the camera ...
in 5-6 months I should be able to afford one :)

Thanks for the review.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>