« Episode 162: Marketing Consultants Introduction | Main | Episode 160: BlueSLR Review »
Monday
Feb072011

Episode 161: Production, Lighting, and Post-Production Tip #9

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Mike,
Thanks for the tutorial, well done. Still not sure about the workflow though, can you just include the flashed shot in the bracketed set and merge in photomatix? Or is there a better way to merge the images? Also would it be ok to have flash on all the bracketed shots, or do you want just one flash / highlight shot?

thanks

February 7, 2011 | Unregistered Commentershane

Hi Shane,

There are a number of ways to incorporate fused shots and lit shots - this was just one way, specifically aimed at correcting white balances from bleeding into one another which happens when there are various color temperatures coming from different directions. Fusing a lit shot with the others is one way of getting the right luminance levels, but I have a feeling it's not going to solve the white balance issue (I haven't tried, I'm only hypothesizing). And sure, you could light each bracketed shot, but that might be overkill and may be more work than is necessary, though it would probably yield a similar result.

Mike

February 8, 2011 | Registered CommenterMike

Mike,

You have your comments or workflow backwards. You say that you like the color balance of the flash shot, but then set it to luminosity - which takes its color out and uses the fused shot's color - but keeps the flashed shot's brightness. If you want the flashed shot's color, then set it to color blend mode. This of course will get you the fused shots luminosity, but I find it helpful to use one layer of the flashed shot set to luminosity (then bring down its opacity to desired level) and another copy with the layer set to color mode at 80+% opacity.

btw, Thanks for your podcasts. I look for them regularly.

February 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterShawn

Hi Shawn,

I think you might be right - I think some words may be backwards, but the workflow is there - at least that's the workflow I'm attempting to highlight. Thanks for pointing it out ;)

Mike

February 8, 2011 | Registered CommenterMike

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>